Skip to main content

Sample Rankings

1. Nuclear Power

  • Great Job establishing a background of nuclear power's history
  • Almost spends to long trying to disprove other claims
  • Cites very trustworthy sources to establish a clear problem
  • Builds solid logos and ethos throughout the piece
  • Nice flow, but almost blends together to much
2. Meal Plans
  • Very concise and well organized
  • Has a very creative and unique solution
  • Is self aware of critiques of her plan and addresses them clearly
  • Over justifies; seems to stretch out some aspects to much
  • Could use a few more statistics to give herself more credit
3. Biodiversity
  • Short, direct, and concise
  • Follows the clear constructs of a proposal
  • For the length, spends to much time on personal interest
  • Doesn't spend a lot time on justifications
  • Feels like lots is left out

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

IMRaD paper

Collegiate Opinions on Prenatal Genetic Engineering and its Uses University of Iowa Abstract Many scientists have written, countered, and fought over the ethics behind genetic engineering, and what its implications would be. Over the last few years genetic engineering has taken leaps and bounds forward with the creation and study of the CRISPR technique, and will only continue to become more detrimental to the fields of medicine and biology in the years to come. With so much in store for the future of genetics, what do college students, future scientists and researchers, believe about this up and coming technology? Are college students as secular and scientifically progressive as we make them out to be? A short survey was formed in order to get the opinions of college students on genetic engineering, specifically prenatal. 39 participants were ultimately recorded, all of which took the survey anonymously online. The data showed that students’ opinions were extremel...

Morality of Genetics Survey

1. Have you ever thought about, considered, or been interested in Genetic Engineering? y/n 2. Prenatal G.E. is the concept of using genetic manipulation in order to change traits of a baby while still an embryo in order to eliminate negative traits or add positive ones. Do you agree with this strategy? In other words, do you find it ethically acceptable? y/n 3. If your child had a negative genetic trait such as Autism, Crohn's, or Huntingtons, would you be willing to use genetic engineering to replace those genes? y/n 4. In the future, it could be very plausible for scientists to recognize genetic coding that could correlate to things such as depression or schizophrenia. In which case, would you be willing to use genetic engineering to correct this? y/n 5. Do you have any known genetic disorders, even repressed, that you know of? Or perhaps any that don't effect you but you know have effected past relatives like grandparents? This can even be things like ...