Skip to main content

Sample Rankings

1. Nuclear Power

  • Great Job establishing a background of nuclear power's history
  • Almost spends to long trying to disprove other claims
  • Cites very trustworthy sources to establish a clear problem
  • Builds solid logos and ethos throughout the piece
  • Nice flow, but almost blends together to much
2. Meal Plans
  • Very concise and well organized
  • Has a very creative and unique solution
  • Is self aware of critiques of her plan and addresses them clearly
  • Over justifies; seems to stretch out some aspects to much
  • Could use a few more statistics to give herself more credit
3. Biodiversity
  • Short, direct, and concise
  • Follows the clear constructs of a proposal
  • For the length, spends to much time on personal interest
  • Doesn't spend a lot time on justifications
  • Feels like lots is left out

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

IMRaD paper

Collegiate Opinions on Prenatal Genetic Engineering and its Uses University of Iowa Abstract Many scientists have written, countered, and fought over the ethics behind genetic engineering, and what its implications would be. Over the last few years genetic engineering has taken leaps and bounds forward with the creation and study of the CRISPR technique, and will only continue to become more detrimental to the fields of medicine and biology in the years to come. With so much in store for the future of genetics, what do college students, future scientists and researchers, believe about this up and coming technology? Are college students as secular and scientifically progressive as we make them out to be? A short survey was formed in order to get the opinions of college students on genetic engineering, specifically prenatal. 39 participants were ultimately recorded, all of which took the survey anonymously online. The data showed that students’ opinions were extremel...
1 comment
Read more

Topic Sources

S1. http://www.pitt.edu/~rqj1/wa3.pdf S2. https://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/~jagadish/ethics_ge.pdf S3. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joel_Anderson5/publication/249147936_Jurgen_Habermas_The_Future_of_Human_Nature_translated_by_Hella_Beister_Max_Pensky_and_William_RehgThe_Future_of_Human_Nature/links/57ac449108ae42ba52b1f7f3/Jurgen-Habermas-The-Future-of-Human-Nature-translated-by-Hella-Beister-Max-Pensky-and-William-RehgThe-Future-of-Human-Nature.pdf S4. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.10101/full S5. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471491415001562
Post a Comment
Read more