Skip to main content

Rough Draft

Intro: -Relevance of writing in chem.
   -Diction and effects on tone
   -Use of APA and it's informal counterparts
   -Primary v. Secondary research
   -Tie to purpose; reflecting audience, purpose, etc. (Brief)

Nonacademic Section: -Use of non-acad. writing; when and why.
   -Varying diction throughout different sources, slow build up
   -Structuring; expectations and variations of different types, their purposes.

Transition:
   -Nonacademic educational piece; how it demonstrates the scaling diction and a mingling of diction; why.

Academic: -Use of academic; when and why.
   -They stress of extremely learned diction
   -Primary v. Secondary sources: (may split into their own two sections)
      -Differences in referencing
      -Use of diagrams/variations in structure
   -Use and purpose of APA

Conclusion: -The relevance of writing in chem.
   -The scaling diction throughout various sources
   -APA v. the informal variations and their uses.
   -Grey areas; transitional academic pieces, primary v. secondary minimal small differences

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Morality of Genetics Survey

1. Have you ever thought about, considered, or been interested in Genetic Engineering? y/n 2. Prenatal G.E. is the concept of using genetic manipulation in order to change traits of a baby while still an embryo in order to eliminate negative traits or add positive ones. Do you agree with this strategy? In other words, do you find it ethically acceptable? y/n 3. If your child had a negative genetic trait such as Autism, Crohn's, or Huntingtons, would you be willing to use genetic engineering to replace those genes? y/n 4. In the future, it could be very plausible for scientists to recognize genetic coding that could correlate to things such as depression or schizophrenia. In which case, would you be willing to use genetic engineering to correct this? y/n 5. Do you have any known genetic disorders, even repressed, that you know of? Or perhaps any that don't effect you but you know have effected past relatives like grandparents? This can even be things like ...

Sample Rankings

1. Nuclear Power Great Job establishing a background of nuclear power's history Almost spends to long trying to disprove other claims Cites very trustworthy sources to establish a clear problem Builds solid logos and ethos throughout the piece Nice flow, but almost blends together to much 2. Meal Plans Very concise and well organized Has a very creative and unique solution Is self aware of critiques of her plan and addresses them clearly Over justifies; seems to stretch out some aspects to much Could use a few more statistics to give herself more credit 3. Biodiversity Short, direct, and concise Follows the clear constructs of a proposal For the length, spends to much time on personal interest Doesn't spend a lot time on justifications Feels like lots is left out

Speech Commercial

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woXzxKid5qM For this Old Spice commercial, I want to focus on three main points through the speech. 1) Absurdity/Humor: the commercial uses absurd and over the top visuals for humorous camera shots, which creates a sense of fun and joy. It also serves to create intrigue, as such odd visuals go against our mythos, or previous preconceptions of commercials, and makes you want to stay and watch. 2) Meta Criticism/Self Awareness: This is used in a fantastic way, as it jabs at other commercials that have also started using the absurd style that Old Spice has. This actually provides some ethos in my opinion, as it makes them suddenly seem very knowledgeable about the industry. However it's also used as a comedic turn, which is amusing to most audiences, if the blunt absurdity wasn't.  3) Slant/Audience: Strangely, this commercial targets two audiences. One being young men who are the primary users of the product, which is the demographic...