The first source is a journal article from Science Progress, which goes in depth about the specific definitions and characterizations of Organic Chemistry. It's a good example of secondary research that acts as an academic piece, but with an easier diction considering the scope of the piece. I'm hoping to look into it's more unique structure and heavy use of complicated illustrations, as well address the varying degrees of learned and colloquial language. http://www.jstor.org.proxy.lib.uiowa.edu/stable/43424632?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Organic&searchText=Chemistry&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3Ffc%3Doff%26amp%3BsearchType%3DfacetSearch%26amp%3Bgroup%3Dnone%26amp%3Bed%3D%26amp%3Bacc%3Don%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bpage%3D1%26amp%3Bfacet_journal%3Dam91cm5hbA%253D%253D%26amp%3BQuery%3DOrganic%2BChemistry%26amp%3Bsd%3D&refreqid=search%3A1aeaa690c16aae325a671b771302e2fa&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents The second source is anoth...